Legal Opinion

Cascone v. Herb Kay Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1983No. 82-1330PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The question presented here is whether, considering the materials before the trial court, inclusive of the pleadings, interrogatories, depositions and affidavits, the trial court was justified in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we hold that the appellee! s motion for summary judgment here should not have been granted.

Civ. R. 56(C) provides that summary judgment shall be rendered if the “pleading, depositions * * * [and] affidavits * * * show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neff Lumber Co. v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Shinaver v. SzymanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API