De Haven v. Superior Court

THE COURT.

In making the order denying the petition for writ of mandate, we relied upon the decision of this court in Anderson v. Superior Court, 103 Cal. App. 360 [284 Pac. 494], In that ease it was held that where an interlocutory decree of divorce did not in terms provide for and direct the payment of alimony, but merely referred to an agreement between the parties and purported to make same “a part and portion of this interlocutory judgment”, such reference did not constitute an order for payment of any sum. Petitioner now calls attention to decisions made in Tripp v. Superior Court, 61…