Legal Opinion

Dupont v. Dupont

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1935No. S. F. 15341PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff, to whom was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce, appeals from an order modifying the provision of the decree relating to property, attorney fees and costs.

It is the contention of appellant that the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction in granting the motion for modification, made on the papers in the case and affidavit of the defendant. No ground was stated in the notice and the order merely recites “that good cause exists therefor”. The interlocutory decree awarded the plaintiff a lump sum of $1,000 as her share of the community property, the sum of $150 attorney’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. De Haven v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Robert A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles District, California v. M. Robert Guggenheim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API