Legal Opinion

Interior Alaska Airboat Ass'n v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2001No. S-8869PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Challenged in this case is the designation of two areas by the Board of Game as controlled use areas (CUAs). The Noatak CUA closes a corridor along the Noatak River to the use of aireraft for big game hunting for a part of the hunting season. The Nenana CUA prohibits the use of airboats for moose hunting in a portion of the Tanana Flats for all of the hunting season. Interior Alaska Airboat Association contends that the regulations establishing these CUAs violate article I, section 1 and article VIII, sections 1-4, 14, 16 and 17 of the Alaska…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Grunert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Wilber v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Alaska Center for the Environment v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API