Legal Opinion
Manning v. State, Department of Fish & Game
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 2015No. 7036 S-15121PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
WINFREE, Justice.'
1. INTRODUCTION
The Alaska Board of Game promulgated regulations managing caribou hunting in Game Management Unit 13. The regulations allow hunting under three types of permits: a community harvest subsistence permit, an individual subsistence permit, or a non-subsistence drawing permit. A hunter challenged the regulations on constitutional and statutory grounds, arguing that they wrongfully interfered with his subsistence hunting rights, and also sought a judicially imposed public reprimand of an assistant attorney general representing the Board. The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Cook Inlet Fisherman's Fund v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Tammie Guilford v. Weidner Investment Services, Inc., Weidner Investment Services, Inc. v. Tammie GuilfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Kevin Meyer, Lieutenant Governor of the State of v. Stand for SalmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.