Legal Opinion

Alaska Center for the Environment v. Rue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2004No. S-10887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Center for the Environment and the Alaska Wildlife Alliance (collectively, “the center”) filed a superior court action challenging a decision by the Commissioner of Fish and Game declining to list the Cook Inlet beluga whale as endangered under the Alaska Endangered Species Act. The commissioner found that Cook Inlet belugas failed to qualify for endangered species listing because they are not currently threatened with extinction, and also because they are not a distinct subspecies within the meaning of the act. The superior court upheld…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. DupierAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Copeland v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API