Legal Opinion
State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. Cosio
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1993No. 3998PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Under AS 43.23.005(a)(1) a “state resident” is entitled to receive a permanent fund dividend. Alaska Statute 43.23.095(8) defines “state resident” as “an individual who is physically present in the state with the intent to remain permanently in the state.... ” From 1985 to 1987, Arturo and Tomas Cosio were in the United States illegally. During that period, however, both men were physically present in Alaska and intended to remain. The Cosíos claim they were “state residents” within the meaning of AS 43.23 and thus entitled to a permanent fund dividend.
The Cosíos…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Planned Parenthood of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.