Grunert v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Grunert, a fisher in the Chignik Purse Seine Salmon Fishery, argues that an Alaska Board of Fisheries regulation creating a Chignik cooperative fishery and allocating a quota of salmon to that fishery is invalid on grounds it exceeds the scope of the board’s authority, is inconsistent with the statutory definition of “fishery” in the Limited Entry Act, is inconsistent with the Limited Entry Act’s purpose and policy, and is unconstitutional. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the board, denied summary judgment to Grunert, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Reetz v. BozanichSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Vanek v. STATE, BOARD OF FISHERIESAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Wilber v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.