Legal Opinion
Larson v. Koch Refining Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1996No. Civ. 3-94-1100PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff worked for Defendant from December 3, 1973, until April 13, 1994. Over the course of his employment, Plaintiff worked his way up from an hourly employee to a supervisor. Plaintiff served as a supervisor at Defendant’s refinery during the last four years of his employment.
For most of Plaintiff’s career with Defendant, he performed his duties responsibly. However, during the latter part of his time…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Robert E. Maddox, III v. University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Board of Trustees Doug A. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brundage v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Dovenmuehler v. St. Cloud HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- William Andrew Mararri v. Wci Steel, Inc., A/K/A Warren Consolidated IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Braziel v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Dieter Huppenbauer v. The May Department Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.