Legal Opinion

Sudbrock v. Kroener

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1934No. Docket No. 1471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARMER, J., pro tem.

On or about March 7, 1932, Frank Sudbrock, as plaintiff, instituted suit against Elizabeth Kroener, as defendant on a promissory note for $600, dated March 23, 1927, and due one year thereafter, to recover the principal sum thereof with interest.

Elizabeth Kroener filed an answer and cross-complaint, by which cross-complaint she prayed judgment against plaintiff and cross-defendant for services performed between January 1, 1921, and the seventh day of March, 1932. Upon the trial of the cause, the court rendered its opinion on or about the fourteenth day of December, 1932,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Trout v. OgilvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Cohen v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Bailey v. LeeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Teel v. HarlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Betty v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API