Legal Opinion

Freitas v. Freitas

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1916No. Civ. No. 1754PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff in this case is the widow of Manuel T. Freitas, deceased. The defendants, Manuel F. Freitas, Jr., Mary Freitas Lopez, Francisco Freitas, and Anna Freitas Nula are the children of said deceased by a former marriage. The defendant Unica Portugueza de Estada da California is a beneficiary corporation. The complaint in substance alleged, and the trial court in effect found, that the plaintiff was induced to marry Manuel T. Freitas, since deceased, by an antenuptial agreement, wherein he promised the plaintiff that if she would marry him he would make her the beneficiary of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hoeft v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Adams v. Grand Lodge of the A. O. U. W.California Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Supreme Lodge of the Knights of Pythias v. FerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McDonald v. LambertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. GeboSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API