Legal Opinion

Teel v. Harlan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1947No. 32953PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of distribution in the administration of the estate of John C. Teel, deceased.

Plaintiff in error, Martha Gilbert Teel, the widow of John C. Teel, is administratrix of the estate. John C. Teel died intestate May 2, 1945, survived by Martha and his daughter by a former marriage, Iva Harlan, heirs at law. The administratrix sought distribution of the estate in equal shares to herself and the daughter.

Plaintiff in error and John C. Teel were married January 28, 1938. Thereafter, in February, 1941, they signed a written agreement denominated “Contract and Agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McAnnulty v. McAnnultyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Murphy v. McElroySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Rowell v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Sperling v. MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. In Re Blaydes' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Dan W. ShafferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API