Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Western Development Syndicate

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1915No. S.F. No. 6360PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Page, McCutchen, Knight & Olney, and McCutchen, OIney & Willard, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff as a judgment creditor of the defendant, The Gray Brothers Crushed Rock Company, to set aside transfers of property made by said judgment debtor to the other defendant corporations, to wit, Western Development Syndicate and Golden Gate Tile Company. The complaint was in several counts, and in it the plaintiff based his right to follow the property into the hands of the transferees upon the grounds: 1. That the Golden Gate Tile Company and the Western Development Syndicate were in fact “but continuations of the defendant The Gray Brothers Crushed Rock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
  2. Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kohl v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. BeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API