Legal Opinion

Betty v. Knapp

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1935No. Civ. 5334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff had judgment in an action brought to set aside a conveyance of certain property, made, executed and delivered by the defendants, E. W. Knapp and Ellen B. Crowder, to June Knapp, on the ground that said conveyance was made to defraud creditors. From this judgment the defendants appeal.

The record shows that on or about the thirty-first day of August, 1928, the plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, numbered 260222, against the defendants, Ellen B. Crowder and E. W. Knapp, and on May 6, 1929, the plaintiff recovered judgment against said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Sudbrock v. KroenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Reagan v. BairdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Neumeyer v. Crown Funding Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Knapp v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API