Pita v. Whitney
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The final exception is to the refusal to grant a new trial. The plaintiff established by proof such a case as entitled her to an injunction, under the authority of the ease of Mackenzie v. Minis, 132 Ga. 323 (63 S. E. 900, 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1003, 16 Ann. Gas. 723); and a new trial will not be granted unless, in considering the other assignments, it be determined that previous rulings on the pleadings contained such error as rendered nugatory the trial before the jury.
The cross-action is based entirely upon an alleged breach ■of contract. This contract is set out in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Bentley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Beecher v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Weegham v. KilleferDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1914
- Oliver Construction Co. v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weill v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Gray v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Alexis Inc. v. WerbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Demer v. Capital City Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Bertotti v. Philbeck, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.