Legal Opinion

Weegham v. Killefer

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 10, 1914PublishedCited by 28 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Charles Weegham and another, copartners doing business under the name of the Chicago Federal League Baseball Club, against William Killefer, jr., and the Philadelphia National League Club. On motion for a preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

SESSIONS, District Judge.

This record shows that the defendant, Killefer, is a baseball player of unique, exceptional, and extraordinary skill and expertness. Unfortunately, the record also shows that he is a person upon whose pledged word little or no reliance can he placed, and who, for gain to himself, neither scruples nor hesitates to disregard and violate his express engagements and agreements. His repudiation of one contract, for the making of which he had been paid several hundred dollars, and his breach of another contract, entered into after at least a week’s consideration and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Deweese v. ReinhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Metropolitan Exhibition Co. v. EwingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  4. Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Michigan Pipe Co. v. Fremont Ditch, Pipe Line & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Electrical Research Products, Inc. v. Vitaphone Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Spivey v. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API