Legal Opinion
Gray v. Aiken
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 11, 1949No. 16649PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The record in this case presents but one question for determination by this court. Did the plaintiff have an agreement with the 'defendant, to share in profits, which will support an action for a breach of contract?
Counsel for the defendants insist that the alleged contract is too vague, indefinite, uncertain, and wanting in particularity to be enforced. Counsel for the plaintiff insist that the share due the plaintiff under his contract is a “fair share,” “reasonable share,” or “just share,” and that such terms accord with the statement contained in the plaintiff’s letter that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harris & Mitchell v. Amoskeag Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Bentley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Monk v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Pepsi-Cola Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Carr v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Parks v. Atlanta News Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Demer v. Capital City Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Wedgewood Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Color-Set, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.