MacMillan v. C. & G. Cooper Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
This ease was tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed. But for their length, which was induced by amendments proposed, we would adopt them as our own. From them it appears:
In 1928, the plaintiff, a resident of Grand Rapids, was the representative of several manufacturers of factory engines and machinery as a. salesman in Michigan on a commission basis. One of the firms so represented by him was Hooven, Owen, Rentschler Company, of Hamilton, Ohio.
Plaintiff received an inquiry from the Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Company, of Muskegon, for a Diesel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heaton v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Case v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- McKinnon v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Reade v. HaakMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Butterfield v. Metal Flow Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hague v. DelongMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Fernandez v. Powerquest Boats, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.