Legal Opinion

MacMillan v. C. & G. Cooper Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 91, Calendar No. 34,751PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This ease was tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed. But for their length, which was induced by amendments proposed, we would adopt them as our own. From them it appears:

In 1928, the plaintiff, a resident of Grand Rapids, was the representative of several manufacturers of factory engines and machinery as a. salesman in Michigan on a commission basis. One of the firms so represented by him was Hooven, Owen, Rentschler Company, of Hamilton, Ohio.

Plaintiff received an inquiry from the Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Company, of Muskegon, for a Diesel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heaton v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Case v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McKinnon v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Reade v. HaakMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Butterfield v. Metal Flow Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hague v. DelongMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Fernandez v. Powerquest Boats, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API