Case v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Bridgman, J. Assumpsit by Ada Case against the Rudolph Wurlitzer Company for commissions earned by plaintiff’s assignor. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The plaintiff is the widow and assignee of B. R. Case, who was formerly the proprietor of a retail music store in St. Joseph, Mich., and the defendant is a manufacturer of automatic musical instruments, with its principal offices at Cincinnati, Ohio. It appears that in November, 1905, Case wrote a letter to the defendant, and thereto received a reply offering Case the exclusive sale in his section of certain goods manufactured by them. It is the claim of the plaintiff that as a result Case and the defendant entered into a written contract in November, 1905, in which it was provided that Case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Kalamazoo v. Standard Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Houser v. CarmodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Hathaway v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Patterson v. GoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Roberts Associates, Inc. v. Blazer International Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
- Butterfield v. Metal Flow Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.