Heaton v. Edwards
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiffs sued to recover commissions on sale of real estate.
Defendant was the owner of the real estate, and authorized them to negotiate a sale.
Their evidence is to the effect that she offered to take $5,500 for the property; that she afterwards offered to take $5,300; that they opened negotiations November 10, 1889, with one Munro for the purchase; that they obtained a cash offer from him of $5,000, which they submitted to her, but she declined it; that during the latter part of November Mr. Munro called on them, and said that he had seen Mrs. Edwards, and she would take $5,150 if they…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Munro v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Lawson v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.