Legal Opinion
Fernandez v. Powerquest Boats, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 13, 1992No. 1:90-CV-709PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
This case presents an action by a sales representative to recover commissions with respect to sales consummated after he was terminated. Both parties move for summary judgment, agreeing that the relevant facts are not disputed and that the matter is ripe for disposition as a matter of law. The Court has reviewed the briefs and other matters presented, heard arguments on August 3, 1992, and concludes that defendant is entitled to summary judgment.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 1986, plaintiff Joseph Fernandez entered into an oral agreement with defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Militzer v. Kal-Die Casting Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Dikker v. 5-Star Team Leasing, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- Chase v. Matsu Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- L.V. Nagle & Associates, Inc. v. Tubular Steel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022