Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. Gates

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Cheboygan. (Pailthorp, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment for $2,329.04, principal and interest, as commission on the-sale of a lot of logs purchased by defendant from McConnell & Tough, of Canada. Plaintiff McKinnon resides in Cheboygan, in this State, has been a lumberman for 18-years, and for the last 6 years'has been principally engaged in dealing in logs and lumber on commission. Burrell is a-lumberman doing business mostly in Canada. The defendant is a manufacturer of lumber in Bay City, Mich. McConnell & Tough had about 9,000,000 feet of logs lying-in the Spanish river and one of its tributaries in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan National Bank v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Leitelt Iron Works Ex Rel. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. De VriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. MacMillan v. C. & G. Cooper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Churchill v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Germain v. Central Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API