Legal Opinion
Morgan v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 28, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-188PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FIDEL, Judge.
In preparation for the construction of the Squaw Peak Parkway, the City of Phoenix moved and allegedly damaged a trailer belonging to plaintiffs Max and Grace Morgan. This appeal concerns the plaintiffs’ unsuccessful effort to recover damages from the City. By summary judgment, the trial court rejected plaintiffs’ claims that the City’s failure to provide them a pre-re-location hearing and to pay them benefits violated their rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The trial court also granted summary judgment against plaintiffs’ claims that the City converted their trailer and violated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Owens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Howland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Grand Canyon Pipelines, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.