Legal Opinion

Grand Canyon Pipelines, Inc. v. City of Tempe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 28, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

On appeal, Grand Canyon Pipelines, Inc. and R.G. Johnson Contracting, Inc., an Arizona joint venture, (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) seeks to have this court recognize a claim for damages for the alleged violation of its procedural due process rights based upon the failure of the City of Tempe (“City”) to award it a public works contract. Because we hold that a bidder on a public contract has no protected property interest in the award of the contract, and, therefore, no ground for a procedural due process claim under the fourteenth amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Interior Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Newman Memorial County HospitalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Mary Anna Sotomayor v. Pauline Sotomayor-MunozCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Compassionate v. adhs/nelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API