Legal Opinion
Owens v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 15, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0294PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Acting Presiding Judge.
The main issue presented by this appeal is when a cause of action accrues, for the purpose of commencing the running of statutes of limitations, in a suit seeking city relocation assistance and payments after the City of Phoenix (City) purchased the condemned property.
Thomas J. Owens (Owens) brought an action against the City seeking relocation expenses, damages for negligence, and damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (§ 1983). The trial court ruled that the claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. The trial court also held that Owens had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Mammo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Kahn v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.