Daniels v. Williams
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
In Parrott v. Taylor, 451 U. S. 527 (1981), a state prisoner sued under 42 U. S. C. § 1983, claiming that prison officials had negligently deprived him of his property without due process of law. After deciding that § 1983 contains no independent state-of-mind requirement, we concluded that although petitioner had been “deprived” of property within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the State’s postdeprivation tort remedy provided the process that was due. Petitioner’s claim in this case, which also rests on an alleged Fourteenth Amendment “deprivation” caused…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7,343 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7,338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.