Legal Opinion

Howland v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 15, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-537PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

Appellant Chet Howland (plaintiff) appeals from portions of the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint against the State of Arizona, the Arizona Department of Corrections, and several individuals (defendants), claiming that his complaint states claims for relief under federal and state law. 1

The following issues are raised on appeal:

1. Is plaintiff precluded from bringing federal claims against the individual defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the loss of his property without procedural due process because he has an adequate state law remedy in tort for conversion?

2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lasley v. Shrake's Country Club Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Owens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Tripati v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Falcon v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API