Legal Opinion
McCully v. Gano
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 1931No. Docket No. 4299PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.
The plaintiff Earl Justin McCully, an attorney at law, brought this action against his former client, Jennie C. Gano, to recover the sum of $2,581.30 for professional services alleged to have been performed by him for her under a written contract.
The cause was tried by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $700. From this judgment the defendant Gano prosecutes this appeal.
The facts are briefly these: Defendant and appellant employed plaintiff as her attorney to effect a property settlement with her husband with whom she was having…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Countryman v. California Trona Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Merchants Collection Agency v. GopcevicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Tuner & Dahnken v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Fivey v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.