Legal Opinion

Fivey v. Chambers

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1962No. Civ. 19603PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

In this action brought by an attorney’s assignee to recover for legal services rendered and costs disbursed pursuant to a contingent fee contract, defendant appeals from a judgment, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $2,582.01, representing the total of $2,166.66 as an attorney fee and $415.35 as costs.

The complaint is in two counts: the first, on the written contingent fee contract involved, and the second, in quantum meruit. Both counts are on the same transaction and for the same amount of money. The defendant in his answer admits entering into the fee contract but…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Estate of RubenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Brown v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Cohen v. KoenigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API