Legal Opinion

Merchants Collection Agency v. Gopcevic

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 11, 1913No. Civ. No. 1174PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John F. Davis, Charles S. Wheeler, J. F. Bowie, and W. S. Andrews, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from a judgment on an assigned claim in favor of plaintiff for the sum of four hun dred and eighty dollars with interest in the sum of $125.55. We may adopt the following statement of the proceedings as made by appellant:

“The original complaint was filed on October 13, 1908, and contained but one count. . . . Afterwards the said superior court, over the objection of appellant, made an order, duly excepted to by appellant, permitting the respondent to file an amended complaint, and this amended complaint was filed on June 5, 1911. The amended complaint contained two •counts: the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Meinshausen v. A. Gettelman Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Erickson v. Stockton & Tuolumne Cty. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Baird v. OcequedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Connette v. WrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API