Legal Opinion

Federal Surety Co. v. Little

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1931No. 19846PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, a new trial. Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, contend that the trial court committed error as to a simple and unmixed question of law in granting a new trial, and also grossly abused his judicial discretion.

The action is one for the recovery of damages for alleged breach of a contract for the construction of a building. J. C. Gosdin and N. M. Gosdin, partners, doing business as Gosdin Brothers, were the contractors, and Federal Surety Company was their surety upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Holt v. SpicerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Guss v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  5. Hall v. PolsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Belford v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Dillard v. Star Drilling Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Cooke v. SinopouloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Hays Trucking Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Benedict Bros. Const. Co. v. DavoultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API