Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Star Drilling Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1936No. 26865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, the Star Drilling Machine Company, brought this action to recover a, balance owing on notes executed by defendant, R. V. Dillard, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage covering a drilling machine, securing the payment of the debt. Defendant, by answer and cross-petition, claimed damages, in an amount in excess of the amount due on the notes, arising in hjs„fa£pr by reason of the breach ®f warranty of the fitness of the machine to reasonably perform the work for which it was sold, used and intended. Defendant, admitting the balance due on the notes, assumed the burden of proof on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Teeters v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horn v. SturmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Wilson v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Willis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. City of Holdenville v. DeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Downing v. MealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API