Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Sinopoulo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1944No. 31426PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the executor and the administrator, respectively, of the estates of Charles B. Cooke and Alfred G. Smith, deceased, from an order which sustained a motion therefor and granted a new trial.

The testate and intestate, respectively, of the plaintiffs in error, by cross-petition in an action instituted by Leo J. Portman against H. R. Hollenback et al., sought to recover from John Sino-poulo an interest which had been assigned to them by Hollenback in a contract which has been executed by Sino-poulo to Hollenback, whereby the former agreed to pay the latter the sum of $15,000…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jack v. National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Shreve v. CornellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Browne v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa v. ABC Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Sarkeys v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. First Investment Co. v. AndersenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Benedict Bros. Const. Co. v. DavoultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Parker v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API