Legal Opinion
Holt v. Spicer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 5, 1916No. 7710PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error from District Court, Mayes County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by P. C. Holt against Elijah P. Spicer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
On November 5, 1914, P. C. Holt filed his petition in this action alleging that he was the owner and in possession of 80 acres of land, by virtue of a tax deed of date • September 4, 1912, seeking to quiet title thereto, and praying other relief against Elijah P. Spicer, who he declared was asserting title to the same.
The tax deed, in statutory form, which was made a part of the petition as an exhibit, contains the following recital:
“Whereas, P. C. Holt, did on the 4th day of September, A. D. 1912, produce to the undersigned, J. B. Dunham, treasurer of the county of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Davenport v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Blaine County Bank v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Guss v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Parks v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Gulager v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.