King v. Northern Pacific Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by Nathan King and Mary King, his wife, and Yero Borden, against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, R. T. Cummings and Laura Cummings, his wife, and Muller & Gregory, a corporation, to quiet title to section 1, township 23 north, range 8 E.W.M., King county, Washington.
The complaint alleged that plaintiffs were the owners and seized in fee simple of the above-described property; that defendants claimed some interest in the property, the nature of which was unknown to plaintiffs; and that defendants had no interest, title, or right in or to such property.
Defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butts v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Nichols v. OppermannWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Pounds v. EgbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Davis v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Fisher v. HagstromWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Plummer v. FogleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Jones v. ShatinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970