Legal Opinion

Plummer v. Fogley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1961No. 38787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

There is no conflict in the evidence as to the fact that plaintiff and defendant did during the latter part of August, 1956, have a discussion concerning the entering into a partnership agreement to operate a restaurant, and a series of conversations and discussions took place from time to time thereafter. The evidence is not in conflict that defendant offered plaintiff a partnership interest in the contemplated restaurant for a consideration of $5,000. However, the testimony of plaintiff is to the effect that after he informed defendant he could not raise any money defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Dieffenbach v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Benzel v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Brewer v. CroppWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kunkel v. RattraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cohlmia, Jr. v. St. John Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Johnson v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Payne v. McRay BrothersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Richterberg v. Wittich Memorial ChurchDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API