Legal Opinion
Malnar v. Carlson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1996No. 62974-9PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
910 P.2d 455 (1996)
128 Wash.2d 521
Robert F. MALNAR, a single man, Petitioner,
v.
Robert CARLSON and Diane Carlson, and the marital community composed thereof, and Golden Valley Ltd., a Washington corporation, Respondents.
No. 62974-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
February 1, 1996.
James F. Graham, Renton, for petitioner.
Robert Felker, Tacoma, Ross Taylor, Tacoma, for respondents.
GUY, Justice.
The trial court dismissed this action for an accounting of partnership assets based on the statute of limitation. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
On January 17, 1992, Ronald Malnar (Plaintiff)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.