Legal Opinion

Malnar v. Carlson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1996No. 62974-9PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— The trial court dismissed this action for an accounting of partnership assets based on the statute of limitation. We reverse and remand for trial.

Facts

On January 17, 1992, Ronald Malnar (Plaintiff) sued Robert Carlson (Defendant) alleging that a partnership existed between them to purchase, develop and resell real estate, and to share in the profits. The Plaintiff sought an accounting of the profits of the joint venture.1 The Defen*524dant moved for summary judgment based on three grounds: (1) the case was not filed within the statute of limitation, (2) the verbal partnership agreement was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API