Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Oppermann

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1893No. 868PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Plaintiffs allege that they had entered into an agreement with certain of the defendants for an exchange of lands, and they brought this action to enforce a specific performance. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed. Deeds had been prepared and signed by the respective parties, and deposited with John P. Cass, one of the defendants, who was the general legal adviser and attorney for the others. The complaint did not allege whether the contract was in writing or by parol. The answer of the defendants denied the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonham v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wier v. BatdorfNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Popp v. SwankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Graves v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Holohan v. MelvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Jones v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API