Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Hagstrom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1950No. 30971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff H. R. Fisher to quiet title to certain lands as against any claim of the defendants. The defendants, by their amended answer, denied plaintiff’s title and interposed two affirmative defenses: (1) adverse possession for more than ten years, and (2) a common boundary established by agreement and acquiescence. The affirmative defenses being denied by the reply, the action was tried to the court sitting without a jury. During the trial, plaintiff’s wife, Nettie Fisher, was by stipulation joined as a party plaintiff.

At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Lambuth v. Stetson & Post, Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hector v. HectorWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gould v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. King County v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Frolund v. FranklandWashington Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API