Conatser v. Johnson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
11 In this case, we must determine the seope of the public's easement in state waters. More specifically, we must determine whether the easement, which allows the public to engage in recreational activities in state waters, also allows the public the right to touch the privately owned beds below those waters. 1
2 Plaintiffs, the Conatsers, sought a declaration from the district court that the pub-lies easement allows the public to "touch or walk on the bottoms [of state waters] in non-obtrusive ways." The district court denied the Conatsers' motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Utah Stream Access Coal. v. Orange St. Dev.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Utah Stream Access Coal. v. VR Acquisitions, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.