Legal Opinion

Day v. Armstrong

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1961No. 2961, 2966PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

Plaintiff in March, 1958, sought judgment declaring his rights and those of the public, under applicable provisions of the Federal Constitution, the State Constitution, the laws of Wyoming-, and judicial decisions, to go upon the channel, between its high water marks, and to float upon the waters of the North Platte River where it flows upon and across defendants’ lands.

Defendants denied plaintiff’s and the public’s right to either use the channel or to float upon the waters of the river as they crossed their lands, but joined in asking a declaratory judgment.

The State of Wyoming by its…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Montana Coalition for Stream Access, Inc. v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API