Legal Opinion

Utah Stream Access Coal. v. VR Acquisitions, LLC

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2019No. Case No. 20151048PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice Lee, opinion of the Court:

¶1 In Conatser v. Johnson we recognized a public easement right "to touch privately owned beds of state waters in ways incidental to all recreational rights" to those waters. 2008 UT 48 , ¶ 19, 194 P.3d 897 . Citing common-law easement principles, we held that the "incidental right of touching the water's bed is reasonably necessary" to the public's right not just to float on the water but also to wade in waters for hunting, fishing, swimming, and other forms of recreation. Id. ¶¶ 22-25. And we concluded that an easement right of incidental…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. W. E. B. DuBois Clubs of America v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ppl Montana, LLC v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re J.L...Utah Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Drew v. Pacific Life Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  3. League of Women Voters v. Utah State LegislatureUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  4. ARMENTA v. UNIFIED FIREUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API