Legal Opinion

Valcarce v. Fitzgerald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1998No. 960144, 960201PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiff Jim J. Valearce and counterclaim defendant Paul Valearce, Jim’s father, appeal from a decision by the First District Court in Box Elder County that (i) ruled that defendant James B. Fitzgerald and intervenors Fairview “C” Bar Ranch and DeWayne and Joyce Julander (“the Fitzgerald parties”) had a prescriptive right to take water across the Valcarces’ property, (ii) awarded damages to the Fitzgerald parties for the Valcarces’ interference with the water right and enjoined further interference by the Valcarces, and (iii) awarded the Fitzgerald parties…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. KillpackUtah Supreme Court · 2008

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API