Legal Opinion

Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. Moyle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1946No. 6721PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

A petition for hearing has been filed in behalf of plaintiff below. Our original opinion in this case, 109 Utah 197, 159 P. 2d 596, reversed the judgment of the lower court and remanded the case with instructions to dissolve the injunction.

Mr. Justice Wade in the court’s original opinion of the case clearly stated the facts as follows:

“Plaintiff, respondent herein, an irrigation company, as the owner of easements for its ditches and canals which extended across tracts of land owned by defendants, appellants herein, brought this suit to enjoin the defendants from preventing it…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buford v. HoutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baldwin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Dyer v. CompereNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API