Legal Opinion

McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2012No. 20100847PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

T1 After sustaining injuries in an auto accident, Tavis MeArthur filed this suit in federal district court to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under his State Farm automobile insurance policy. Soon *983thereafter, State Farm filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that MeArthur had failed to exhaust the liability limits of the tortfeasor's insurance, a precondition of his UIM benefits policy. The district court granted the motion, upholding this exhaustion provision against McArthur's claim that it was void on public policy grounds.

{2 McArthur…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Mind & Motion Utah Investments, LLC v. Celtic Bank Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Healthbanc Int'l, LLC v. Synergy Worldwide, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Cross v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. VCS, Inc. v. La Salle Development, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API