Legal Opinion

LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1991No. C5-90-1436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s finding that it committed a discriminatory practice by failing to provide respondent reasonable accommodation to assist her return to work. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Mary LaMott worked as a housekeeper and laundry worker at appellant Apple Valley Health Care, Inc. between October 1984 and June 1987. In April 1986, respondent suffered a severe cerebral hemorrhage resulting from an aneurysm, lapsed into a coma and suffered paralysis. Following a near miraculous recovery, respondent began rehabilitation at Sister Kenny Institute in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Ryther v. KARE 11District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  3. Miller v. Centennial State BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Helgerson v. Bridon Cordage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API