LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s finding that it committed a discriminatory practice by failing to provide respondent reasonable accommodation to assist her return to work. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Mary LaMott worked as a housekeeper and laundry worker at appellant Apple Valley Health Care, Inc. between October 1984 and June 1987. In April 1986, respondent suffered a severe cerebral hemorrhage resulting from an aneurysm, lapsed into a coma and suffered paralysis. Following a near miraculous recovery, respondent began rehabilitation at Sister Kenny Institute in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Ryther v. KARE 11District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Miller v. Centennial State BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Helgerson v. Bridon Cordage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.