Legal Opinion
Ryther v. KARE 11
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 3, 1994No. Civ. 4-91-943PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on C. Thomas Ryther’s (“Ryther”) motion for further relief under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (ADEA) and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.03, et. seq. (MHRA). The background of this case is set forth in the court’s order dated September 13, 1994, and need not be repeated here.
An eight day jury trial was held in September 1993. At the close of Ryther’s case, defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law on all claims. The motion was granted as to Ryther’s defamation claim but…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CriswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dutcher v. Randall FoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana S.A. De C v. v. Sharp Capital, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Cowden v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Cappellini v. Mellon Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Denesha v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.