Legal Opinion
Miller v. Centennial State Bank
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1991No. C3-90-2634PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges summary judgment for respondent employer and alleges that the trial court erred when it concluded that respondent discharged appellant for a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason. We affirm.
FACTS
The parties stipulated to a detailed set of facts. Appellant, Phyllis Miller, began working for respondent, Centennial State Bank, in 1964 as a receptionist. Over the years she has held numerous positions, culminating in assistant vice president and head cashier of the bank. On May 16, 1986, the bank president, Lyle Muehlbauer, informed appellant of her…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- James L. Miller v. Certainteed Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Certainteed Corporation Salaried Employees Pension Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Western National Mutual GroupDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Hermeling v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994