Merriman v. Wickersham
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
is the assignee of the Burn-ham & Marsh Company (a corporation), real-estate brokers. The action is for commissions due upon an alleged sale for F. A. Wickersham. Suit was commenced against Wicker-sham in his lifetime. He suffered default. Plaintiff after-wards consented that his default might he set aside. His death following, his executrix was substituted as defendant.
Wickersham had given to the Burnham & Marsh Company a power of attorney to sell certain described property for the sum of thirty thousand dollars. The instrument provided: “I hereby agree to pay to said Burnham & Marsh Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crane v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flach v. Gottschalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Smith v. SchieleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City Savings Bank v. EnosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Gregory v. BonneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Merkeley v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.